Click to see the beacon journal online
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Akron Law Café -- Community Blog

Previous post: Clinton's Policy Recognizing Domestic Partners and DOMA

Next post: Sotomayor and the New Haven Firefighter Case

It's Sotomayor!

by Professor Will Huhn on May 26, 2009

in Uncategorized

     Obama just placed Sonia Sotomayor's name in nomination for the Supreme Court of the United States.    Will she be confirmed by the Senate?     Judge Sotomayor has impeccable educational credentials, practice as an assistant prosecutor and associate in a corporate firm, long experience on the federal District Court and Second Circuit Court of Appeals, and a compelling personal story of rise from poverty.  At this moment the only reason to oppose her confirmation would be if you disagree with how she is likely to interpret the broad phrases of the Constitution - which I believe to be a legitimate reason to oppose a judicial candidate, but which is unlikely to succeed unless the candidate's views are so extreme as to place her outside the mainstream of American legal traditions.  In short, whether conservative or liberal, a capable candidate is likely to be confirmed so long as he or she is not considered to be radical. 

     In future posts I will review some of Judge Sotomayor's past decisions and attempt to summarize her judicial philosophy.   Also, in about two hours the California Supreme Court will announce its decision in the Prop 8 case.  So there will be lots to discuss and debate in the coming days!

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Carl Gustav May 26, 2009 at 12:59 pm

Awesome! Another token politician in Washington!

Dave May 26, 2009 at 1:49 pm

I don't think there is much doubt that she will be confirmed, relatively quickly.

If I may be so bold, I would ask that you emphasize the occasions that she was overturned by the Supreme Court. And then maybe discuss the question – Was Judge Sotomayor sent to change the court?

Jill May 26, 2009 at 8:55 pm

@ Carl
You would prefer yet another white man, perhaps?

Thanks Professor Huhn, looking forward to the review and summary. What about the "courts making policy" comment, which I assume will be mentioned at the confirmation hearings?

larry d. May 31, 2009 at 3:51 pm

Would a white man be wrong, Jill?

Leave a Comment

Previous post: Clinton's Policy Recognizing Domestic Partners and DOMA

Next post: Sotomayor and the New Haven Firefighter Case

 

© The Akron Beacon Journal • 44 E. Exchange Street, Akron, Ohio 44308

Powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).