<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Response to Reader Comments on Abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohioverticals.com/blogs/akron_law_cafe/2009/06/response-to-reader-comments-on-abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohioverticals.com/blogs/akron_law_cafe/2009/06/response-to-reader-comments-on-abortion/</link>
	<description>University of Akron School of Law Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:48:47 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan S.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohioverticals.com/blogs/akron_law_cafe/2009/06/response-to-reader-comments-on-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-1739</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohioverticals.com/blogs/akron_law_cafe/?p=2104#comment-1739</guid>
		<description>Thankyou for responding to my submission. 

RE: &quot;Does our understanding of who is a &quot;person&quot; arise from moral considerations?&quot;

No; it is, or at least could be, based upon the point in fetal development where the entity becomes capable of sustaining life without direct support from the mother&#039;s body.  

My underlying thought was that at some point, a social/legal compromise will be reached that only permits elective abortions up to a certain stage of fetal development. I suspect that early term abortions will be permitted as a matter of personal choice and late term abortions will be prohibited unless the continued pregnancy poses an obvious threat to the physical health of the pregnant female. Nobody would be completely satisfied, but it would work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankyou for responding to my submission. </p>
<p>RE: &#034;Does our understanding of who is a &#034;person&#034; arise from moral considerations?&#034;</p>
<p>No; it is, or at least could be, based upon the point in fetal development where the entity becomes capable of sustaining life without direct support from the mother&#039;s body.  </p>
<p>My underlying thought was that at some point, a social/legal compromise will be reached that only permits elective abortions up to a certain stage of fetal development. I suspect that early term abortions will be permitted as a matter of personal choice and late term abortions will be prohibited unless the continued pregnancy poses an obvious threat to the physical health of the pregnant female. Nobody would be completely satisfied, but it would work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry d.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohioverticals.com/blogs/akron_law_cafe/2009/06/response-to-reader-comments-on-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-1735</link>
		<dc:creator>larry d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohioverticals.com/blogs/akron_law_cafe/?p=2104#comment-1735</guid>
		<description>It seems to me much of politics revolves around abortion presently--it&#039;s the great demonizer on both sides and a litmus test for millions of citizens who don&#039;t want to spend more than five minutes deciding who to vote for. 

If Jon is right, that would support my contention. Abortion is legal now, no? The clauses are just two more reasons why it would remain legal in most areas of the country post Roe v. Wade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me much of politics revolves around abortion presently&#8211;it&#039;s the great demonizer on both sides and a litmus test for millions of citizens who don&#039;t want to spend more than five minutes deciding who to vote for. </p>
<p>If Jon is right, that would support my contention. Abortion is legal now, no? The clauses are just two more reasons why it would remain legal in most areas of the country post Roe v. Wade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
