<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Interplay of Sections 776.041 (Use of Force by Aggressor) and 776.013(3) (Stand Your Ground) in Zimmerman Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohioverticals.com/blogs/akron_law_cafe/2012/04/the-interplay-of-sections-776-041-use-of-force-by-aggressor-and-776-0133-stand-your-ground-in-zimmerman-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohioverticals.com/blogs/akron_law_cafe/2012/04/the-interplay-of-sections-776-041-use-of-force-by-aggressor-and-776-0133-stand-your-ground-in-zimmerman-case/</link>
	<description>University of Akron School of Law Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:54:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gandydancer</title>
		<link>http://www.ohioverticals.com/blogs/akron_law_cafe/2012/04/the-interplay-of-sections-776-041-use-of-force-by-aggressor-and-776-0133-stand-your-ground-in-zimmerman-case/comment-page-1/#comment-13461</link>
		<dc:creator>Gandydancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 04:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohioverticals.com/blogs/akron_law_cafe/?p=10550#comment-13461</guid>
		<description>&quot;This statute allows an aggressor to claim self-defense only if the person &quot;has exhausted every reasonable means to escape&quot; or if &quot;the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force.&quot;&quot; is simply false.

You quote 776.041(2)a. Didn&#039;t you read it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;This statute allows an aggressor to claim self-defense only if the person &#034;has exhausted every reasonable means to escape&#034; or if &#034;the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force.&#034;" is simply false.</p>
<p>You quote 776.041(2)a. Didn&#039;t you read it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry d.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohioverticals.com/blogs/akron_law_cafe/2012/04/the-interplay-of-sections-776-041-use-of-force-by-aggressor-and-776-0133-stand-your-ground-in-zimmerman-case/comment-page-1/#comment-13252</link>
		<dc:creator>larry d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohioverticals.com/blogs/akron_law_cafe/?p=10550#comment-13252</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen any evidence that Zimmerman believed Trayvon was committing a crime or that he provoked physical interaction in any way. Unless some new evidence comes to light, the prosecutor seems to be guided by something other than evidence and law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#039;t seen any evidence that Zimmerman believed Trayvon was committing a crime or that he provoked physical interaction in any way. Unless some new evidence comes to light, the prosecutor seems to be guided by something other than evidence and law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
