This post summarizes the constitutional issues that the Supreme Court will have to determine in addressing the constitutionality of the individual mandate contained in the 2010 federal health care law.
From the category archives:
University of Akron School of Law Blog
-
Subscribe Via RSS
-
Search This Blog
-
Recent Posts
- Jefferson Davis' Speech at Macon, Georgia, September 23, 1864: Worst Speech Ever?
- Was Jesus for Small Government?
- Florida Cases Interpreting Section 776.041: Person Who "Initially Provoked" Incident May Not Claim Self Defense
- The Interplay of Sections 776.041 (Use of Force by Aggressor) and 776.013(3) (Stand Your Ground) in Zimmerman Case
- Investigators' Affidavit Emphasizes Zimmerman's Suspicion of Martin
- Zimmerman's Low Burden of Proof on the Issue of Self Defense
- Florida Statutes on Second Degree Murder and Manslaughter
- Presentation by Professor Huhn Today At Ohio Northern University Pettit School of Law
- Corporate Theory As “Metaphysical Mumbo Jumbo” and “Transcendental Nonsense”
- "Immorality" and Social Change
Tag Cloud
2011-2012 supreme court term abortion abortion funding Abraham Lincoln barack obama baucus bill CBO commerce clause constitution constitutional interpretation constitutional law defense of marriage act democracy DOMA don't ask don't tell equality equal protection establishment clause First Amendment fourteenth amendment freedom of expression freedom of religion freedom of speech free exercise clause gay rights health care health care financing reform health care reform health insurance reform individual mandate intellectual property law legal education necessary and proper clause obama oral argument PPACA President Obama public option right to privacy same-sex marriage separation of powers sotomayor supreme court tortureCategories
Archive By Date
Recent Comments
- cheap car shipping on Florida Cases Interpreting Section 776.041: Person Who "Initially Provoked" Incident May Not Claim Self Defense
- Sick Of Lies on Florida Cases Interpreting Section 776.041: Person Who "Initially Provoked" Incident May Not Claim Self Defense
- Spokker on Zimmerman's Low Burden of Proof on the Issue of Self Defense
- What if Zimmermann Walks? - Page 22 on Zimmerman's Low Burden of Proof on the Issue of Self Defense
- Trayvon Martin Case: Does Zimmerman’s Self Defense Claim Depend on Who Started the Fight? | pridek news mag on Florida Cases Interpreting Section 776.041: Person Who "Initially Provoked" Incident May Not Claim Self Defense
Pages
- Red Cross Concludes C.I.A. Engaged in Torture
- About Akron Law Café
- About The University of Akron School of Law
- Meet the Bloggers – Wilson R. Huhn
- Meet the Bloggers – Brant T. Lee
- Meet the Bloggers – Lynn M. Lenart
- Meet the Bloggers – E. Stewart Moritz
- Meet the Bloggers – Stefan J. Padfield
- Meet the Bloggers – Ryan G. Vacca
- Meet the Guest Bloggers
Blogroll
- Akron Law on Facebook
- Akron Law on Twitter
- Balkinization
- Feminist Law Professors
- Instapundit
- Jurisdynamics
- Jurist
- Lessig
- Patently-O
- Pho’s Akron Pages
- SCOTUSblog
- The Legal Workshop
- The Supreme Court of the United States
- The University of Akron School of Law
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- The Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIYthemes.
