Phil Savage is out, that is not a doubt. Romeo Crennel is likely in the same boat, but let's wait on that.
Common perception is that Savage helped improve the Browns, and bring them back to respectability. After the debacle of former head coach Butch Davis, improvement seemed to be a near guarantee. What if I told you that Savage was actually worse than Davis?
While it seems unlikely, it's the truth (partially). The Browns from 2001 through the end of 2004 had a combined record of 25 wins and 39 losses. During the Savage era, the Browns were able to muster up 24 wins, compared to 40 losses. Making things even worse, Butch's Browns made the playoffs once, whereas as Savage/Crennel did not make the playoffs at all.
It just doesn't stop at wins and losses though. The Browns under Davis featured an average ranking of 25th in scoring offenese per year. Under Savage/Crennel, they averaged 24th in scoring offense. Much to surprise of this blogger, the defense stayed about the same in scoring defense, averaging a respectable 17th per season, compared to Davis' 15th in scoring defense.
So let's get this straight: The Browns offense, including a season where they ranked 8th in scoring in the NFL, was only one notch on average per year better than Davis' teams, which once featured Adimchinobe Echemandu at running back. The Browns defense, under Davis which featured constant scheme and personnel changes, was about the same as Crennel's, the guy who has been a vaunted defensive assistant for teams such as the Giants and Patriots who won Super Bowls?
A popular point brought up about Savage is that he increased the talent level on the roster from what he inheritted from Davis in 2005. That's great and it gives the team a solid base to build upon, but the Browns statistically were barely better then some Browns teams with far inferior talent. Does it matter who is on your roster if they don't produce?
Take some time to peruse the lineups of the Davis Browns versus the Savage/Crennel Browns, and see what I'm talking about. The 2008 Browns were just about even as their 2003 counterpart.
For as much as credit as I would like to give Savage, it seems like after four years all he's done is change pieces. I will say that he did inherit a bad team, but the players he was putting on the field were not as productive as talent far less superior. Barry Stokes is not the same player as Eric Steinbach, but they both were on bad teams. So does it really matter?
Looking at the Falcons and Dolphins resurrection this season though has to give Cleveland fans hope. Turnarounds can be done, and quickly, if the right vision and direction is placed in the front office. The Browns have talent on their roster, so this job might be much more appealing than it was after the 2004 season.
On a closing note, speaking of the Dolphins, could Bill Parcells be in the Browns plans? He could be able to get out of his contract with the Dolphins, pending the team's sale. One interesting note is that Parcells would not pursue any opening his son-in-law would be interested in. That son-in-law is Patriots vice president Scott Pioli.