I was reading one of the comments from yesterday's post and thought this was something to share with everyone;
" Just so you know…
We bid on a bank owned home over a over last summer. They rejected us a few times. Then we finally came up past where we were comfortable, it took them so long to get back to us….over two weeks! That we pulled our offer. The house sold 3 months later for $40,000 less than our final offer.
In our case it was the best thing that ever happened! We purchased another home and couldn't be happier. But the bank missed out.
The thing with the bank is nothing they do makes any sense. If they would get some people that know what they are doing and sell some of these houses they wouldn't be going under. I think right now the have so many homes they are really looking at the information that they should. Like the comparables and they fact they could sell that house for a fair price. They need to get some real estate people working for the bank and really looking at some of these offers.more
I feel like this is really widespread problem. The banks are making it unbearable for "regular" buyers to deal with them. Once the "good" buyers give up. The only people that can hang in there at all is investors….and they are the ones that low ball and are totally unemotional.
What do you think? Why does the bank play all these games? Why don't they just really access the house appraisal, condition, comparable. And come up with a more fair and aggressive price….below market value if they have to. To ensure that this house will be out of their inventory. It would create urgency and they might get some bids above asking. Maybe you should start that company." - Is it Friday Yet!
I thought this was great!! SO - To answer the last paragraph and give my thoughts in general….
What do I think: In a past life, I represented the bank on properties that had been foreclosed on or worked with the bank appointed trustee, it is never easy and always complicated. Commercial properties are a little different because some of these loans are guaranteed by the SBA at a percentage of the properties appraised value. So - the bank can't sell these properties for less than what it is guaranteed to appraise for or its insured value - they are in the business of getting their money back. I assume the same goes for houses. (minus the SBA guarantee) They will write properties off eventually but will make every effort in the meantime to maximize their invested value.
Why does the bank play games: They suck - JUST KIDDING!!! I know that once the bank has an offer - unless it is amazing - they will typically shop it to see if they can get a better offer. (thus the time lag with all bank held transactions) There is also an entire organization to muddle through which adds to the time in which they respond. (Lots of red tape) No one wants to put their A$$ on the line because when something goes wrong - guess who gets axed - the person who approved the transaction. So - all "i's" and t's" are dotted and crossed. It is also why initially the bank tends to be uber conservative.
Why not use market appraisals, conditions, comps (thus better pricing/ more aggressive): This is (in part) part of the problem we are seeing with the current state of the economy. The appraisers were valuing properties too high. The Realtors were agreeing to list properties too high. And finally - buyers bought too high. SO - all of this has led to skewed appraisals and comps. The numbers from 2006 are not relevant to today's numbers and different areas (ie: Bath vs Copley) are not the same - even though they seem close. So they think they ARE being aggressive but they're not. The bank (sometimes) will not have a local presence, so they have no idea how to price out that market. Banks do like to get inventory off their books - they are retardo though!
I am not sure what is going on with our offer but I loved the question (s)!! Hopefully my answers helped?! As for the new business/ company idea - everything is a possibility!